I was recently interviewed by Michael Moody of Rough Notes Magazine regarding a consulting engagement that I did for Milestone Insurance Company, a Bermuda heterogeneous group captive. Here is the link to the full article in the on-line version of Rough Notes: http://www.roughnotes.com/rnmagazine/2008/may08/05p072.htm
I am a firm believer that a captive should undergo a periodic review from an independent consultant in order to make sure that they are operating with maximum efficiency and taking advantage of every opportunity that a captive mechanism can provide. In the case of Milestone, Catherine Duffin and the folks at Artex have done an excellent job in managing the costs of the program and providing a very stable insurance platform for the members of that group.
But what can a review do besides just provide a scorecard for the current service providers?
Lets look at some potential results from a captive program review:
- When there are changes in risk management personnel the folks who championed and understood the captive may be the ones leaving the organization. The corporate owner of the captive could be faced with owning a sophisticated insurance mechanism that could solve numerous and ongoing strategic risk financing problems but no one that understands it well enough to really use it to its potential. Sort of like having a Maserati in the garage and no one with a driver’s license.
- Things change in the business and regulatory environment. Employee benefits in a captive may not have even been available as an option when the captive was formed. Certainly things have changed in the business world including possible ownership changes, global initiatives and new products. A review can help to identify what new opportunities might exist for the captive that could support the owner from both a risk financing perspective and as an overall growth strategy.
- Third Party liability options in a single parent captive are often the holy grail of reaching favorable tax treatment for the parent’s premiums in the program. The problem with third party liabilities is just that, they represent someone else’s risk and if you aren’t careful about it you can get burned. Captive reviews often turn up third party risk assumption potentials in upstream and downstream stakeholders. Vendors and clients who share common industry characteristics often have the same risk management issues and you’ve already learned how to do with them in your captive. It is a natural related, albeit third party, risk.
- Sometimes a captive has just outlived its usefulness and it needs to be shut down. This is particularly true when the primary motivation for starting the captive was a short term premium savings or some type of tax play.
If you a captive owner or a broker that is responsible for a captive for your client I think there is a lot of value in performing a review of the captive’s operation and its potentials in the current market environment. If you are interested in discussing this more please email me at email@example.com or call me at 440.264.9992.